PML-N and PPP, reached a consensus on the draft of 27th Constitutional Amendment

The coalition partners in the government, the PML-N and the PPP, on Monday reached a consensus on the draft of 27th Constitutional Amendment after lengthy discussion.

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar stated after the meeting was over that the "draft has been given final shape," adding that a few changes were made as agreed upon.

He confirmed that, after reaching a consensus, the draft has been sent for printing.

On the other hand Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Attaullah Tarar on Monday said that there is no deadlock of any kind over the 27th Constitutional Amendment, which is being introduced to promote good governance and strengthen relations between the federation and the provinces.
 
Talking to media outside Parliament House, the minister stated that the required votes for the passage of the amendment are now complete, leaving no room for ambiguity. He described it as a positive constitutional development, emphasizing that the amendment is being introduced in light of the prevailing circumstances.
 He said following extensive deliberations aimed at bolstering Pakistan’s defense and advancing its military strength, substantial and well-considered amendments have been introduced.
 
He underscored that heads of state worldwide including those in the United States are granted immunity, and thus extending the same privilege to Pakistan’s head of state poses no concern.
 
The federal minister praised the prime minister’s decision not to seek immunity, calling it a commendable move. Acting on the prime minister’s directive, the committee has withdrawn the relevant clause, reflecting his belief that he remains answerable to the people.
 
The idea of establishing constitutional courts has long been existed worldwide. In Pakistan, this discussion dates back to the Charter of Democracy, where the PPP, PML-N, and ANP jointly demanded the creation of such courts. After decades of deliberation, the debate has reached its logical conclusion, paving the way for the establishment of constitutional courts in the country. The Constitution, as a living document, continues to evolve adapting to the needs of justice and the aspirations of the people.
 
He stated that following the 26th Amendment, the judiciary’s caseload declined, saving valuable time for litigants. Although constitutional cases are fewer in number, they consume more than half of the courts’ time. Therefore, this development marks a positive step toward ensuring the swift and efficient delivery of justice.