This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here. Welcome to The Logoff: President Donald Trump gave a very long State of the U…

Published 4 months ago on Mar 1st 2026, 4:00 pm
By Web Desk

This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here.
Welcome to The Logoff: President Donald Trump gave a very long State of the Union speech last night, clocking in at a record one hour and 48 minutes.
You can fit a lot into nearly two hours — but, my colleague Zack Beauchamp argues, you only really needed to hear one line: Trump’s attack on Democrats opposing the SAVE Act.
What is the SAVE Act? If passed, the SAVE Act — short for “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” — would make significant changes to US elections by tightening voter ID requirements, requiring proof of citizenship to register, and ending voter registration solely by mail.
What did Trump say on Tuesday? He accused Democrats, who overwhelmingly oppose the SAVE Act, of “want[ing] to cheat” in elections.
“[The Democrats’] policy is so bad that the only way they can get elected is to cheat,” he said. “We’re going to stop it. We have to stop it.”
What’s the big picture? Voter fraud, contrary to what Trump and the GOP claim, is not rampant in the US. In fact, there’s no evidence it’s a major issue at all. But the kind of additional voter ID requirements the SAVE Act proposes would create new administrative barriers to voting that could effectively disenfranchise many Americans.
Why does this matter? The SAVE Act itself is not a five-alarm fire: Not only does it have a difficult, unlikely path to passage in the Senate, but, as Zack points out, it doesn’t actually seem like it would accomplish what Trump claims. (Indeed, it’s not clear that stricter voter ID requirements would benefit Republicans at all.)
Instead, Zack argues, the concern is in what Trump thinks he’d be accomplishing: “Taken literally,” he writes, Trump’s speech “is the president announcing that the stated policy of his administration is preventing the opposition from winning any future election.”
You can read Zack’s full story on the Vox site here.
And with that, it’s time to log off…
It’s a big week on Capitol Hill: After the SOTU last night, today is the annual Bipawtisan Dog Parade (somewhat delayed from its normal October date by last year’s extended government shutdown, and themed for Mardi Gras instead). I especially enjoyed this photo from NOTUS reporter Em Luetkemeyer. Have a great evening, and we’ll see you back here tomorrow!

The Supreme Court’s campaign to expand religious liberty now has a glaring exception
- 18 hours ago
Small aircraft crashes into Beijing's tallest building, eyewitnesses say
- 3 hours ago

Will this 13-year-old girl be the next dictator of North Korea?
- 18 hours ago

Magnitude 6.6 earthquake jolts southern Philippines, no tsunami alert raised
- 6 hours ago
Ann Blyth, film star of 1940s-50s famed for 'Mildred Pierce', dies at 98
- 8 hours ago

The Supreme Court is about to decide if children still have free speech rights
- 18 hours ago

Bullet-hit four bodies found inside ambulance in Bannu: police
- 6 hours ago
Turkiye beat US 3-2 with last-gasp winner in dead rubber in LA
- 8 hours ago

What happens when it breaks 100 degrees in Europe
- 9 hours ago
Ashura being observed nationwide with processions honouring sacrifice of Imam Hussain (RA) and his loyal companions
- 7 hours ago

Why urban Democrats love socialists now
- 18 hours ago

Why Trump is blocking a big housing bill
- 18 hours ago
You May Like
Trending








